halp

I'm so past done with Nietzsche; I've got 2062 words on him and Aristotle and pathways towards whateveronearth they each think a good life is, and every single one of them is Bull

Works cited: 

• Abegg, Edmund. Political Morality in a Disenchanted World, UPA, New York, 2013.
• Aristotle. Politics, 384-322 BC. Trans. CDC Reeve. Cambridge:Hackett, 1998. Print.
• Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, 384-322 BC. Trans. T Irwin. Cambridge: Hackett, 1985. Print.
• Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, 1975. Trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books, 1977. Print.
• Haldane, John. “Is Every Action Morally Significant?” Philosophy, vol. 86, no. 337, 2011, pp. 375–404.
• Nietzsche, Foucault. On the Genealogy of Morals. 1887. Trans. W Kaufmann. New York: Random House, 1967. Print.

I'm supposed to have another 2k to turn in tomorrow/this afternoon and :___________D we'll see what happens, I don't grok Dworkin enough to riff anything off at this level of brain, but this what I've got to work with after the anxiety's had it's say!!
5 hours before I need to head back out, we'll just see!!!

4.5/5 FINALS DONE

not out of my hands, still need to turn these in, but real quick I've got the hart-dworkin ethics one done at 2064 words! 

works cited: 

• Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1986. Print.
• Guest, Stephen. “How to Criticize Ronald Dworkin's Theory of Law.” Analysis, vol. 69, no. 2, 2009, pp. 352–364. JSTOR
• Hart, H L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961. Print.
• Mahoney, Jon. “Objectivity, Interpretation, and Rights: A Critique of Dworkin.” Law and Philosophy, vol. 23, no. 2, 2004, pp. 187–222. JSTOR
• Ozcan, Mehmet. “Ethics and Law: Reassessment on the Legal Positivism.” Philosophy Study, vol 4, 2014, pp. 75-96. 
• Shapiro, Scott. “The “Hart-Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide For The Perplexed.” University of Michigan Law School: Public Law And Legal Theory Working Paper Series, no. 77, 2017